Sunday, February 09, 2014

The Shape of History: From Predictable West-East Oscillations to Mind-Boggling Singularity (or Nightfall?)

(Below is commentary on a history book worth reading:  Ian Morris, Why the West Rules—For Now:  The Patterns of History and What They Reveal About the Future.  New York:  Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 2010.  The well-written work offers valuable historical and geographical insight, providing indispensable background reading for any investors trying to make sense of global investment opportunities today.)

Ian Morris’s Why the West Rules—For Now is the most engrossing, expansive, evidence-based, single-volume story of humankind written to date.  The author’s personable presentation is an interdisciplinary magnum opus of big-history theorizing rooted in essential bean-counting analysis, running from the beginning of observable space-and-time over 13 billion years ago to our present-day global village, and even boldly projecting our (accelerating) development out into the foreseeable future (year 2103).  No work better bridges the gap between the humanities and the sciences—the book should be required summer reading for all freshmen entering college.
Morris’s thesis can be expressed in three words:  “Maps over chaps.”  That is to say, for measuring human “progress” (defined, following Herbert Spencer, as:  when the simple becomes more complex), geography (maps) has more explanatory power than biology and sociology (chaps—O.K., the author is British, and “humans and their relationships” hardly has the same snappy ring that “chaps” does).  Morris systematically tracks a “morally neutral” social development index (additional detail available) consisting of four components—energy capture, urban population, information processing, and war-making capacity—for both a Western core (SW Asia/Europe/U.S.) and an Eastern core (China/Japan) from 14,000 BCE to the present.  His thorough analysis explains how any historical West-East developmental differences are best attributable to geography, not race and culture, and how both long-term lock-in (West always ahead) and short-term accident (change driven by one-off flukes) models fail to explain the (oscillatory) patterns of history.  “Each age gets the thought it needs, dictated by the kind of problems that geography and social development force on it. . . . [P]eople accommodate their culture to the needs of social development,” says Morris.  (Note:  Jared Diamond explained how geographical advantage led to Eurasia’s socioeconomic domination over other continents.  Morris uses geography to explain differences in development between the Western and Eastern cores within the Eurasian continent.)
Keeping Score
Archeology reveals how biologically “modern” Homo sapiens walked out of Africa about 60,000 years ago, replacing Neanderthal, Peking Man and other varieties of humankind who had left Africa earlier.  Morris’s historical account “keeps score” as leadership oscillates between West and East, impacted by semi-hard ceilings on growth, paradoxical disadvantages of development, and oxymoronic advantages of backwardness:
  1. 14,000 BCE to 600 CE:  West is ahead of East for almost 15,000 years.  Following the receding of the Last Glacial Maximum around 14,000 BCE, humans transition from roaming hunter-gatherers to settled agriculturalists, beginning in the most fertile areas (Hilly Flanks and Mesopotamia, and Yellow-Yangzi river valleys) of the Eurasian continent.  Villages become cities, then kingdoms and empires.  Megalomaniacal monuments include King Khufu’s 450-foot-high Great Pyramid in Egypt and the First Emperor’s 6,000-strong clay-soldier Terracotta Army (discovered only in 1974) in Chang’an (now Xi’an).  During the Axial Age from around 500 BCE, the moral foundation of “Man, as we know him today, came into being” (Karl Jaspers), with Confucian and Daoism (East), Buddhism and Jainism (South Asia), Greek philosophy and Judaism, Christianity and Islam (West).  By 1 CE, core population soars:  Rome (population 1 million) and Chang’an (pop. 500,000) in the Roman Empire and Han China, respectively;
  2. 600 CE to 1750 CE:  East moves ahead of West for about 1,000 years.  Completion of the Grand Canal during the early 7th century Sui Dynasty catalyzes growth, continuing into the Tang and Song Dynasties with Empress Wu Zetian in sprawling Chang’an and ironmasters in coal-rich Kaifeng (pop. 1 million each), the Yuan Dynasty with Marco Polo at Kubilai Khan’s court in the 1270s, the 15th century Ming Dynasty with admiral Zheng He’s 300-vessel Treasure Fleets carrying 28,000 men, and the middle of the Qing Dynasty in the 18th century.  During this time, the Roman Empire crumbles, Western development shifts to peripheral areas with expansion of the Habsburg, Holy Roman, Ottoman and Russian empires, and growth later returns to Italy during the Renaissance with Leonardo da Vinci, followed by Kepler in Germany and Newton in England (*); and
  3. 1750 CE to Present:  West surges ahead of East for about 250 years.  Factors driving the rise of the West are:  the relative ease of traversing the Atlantic (the Pacific is broader and more difficult to sail round-trip), closure of the steppe highway by Romanov and Qing gun power (incidentally protecting Europe from disruptive invaders), and the higher economic incentive the West has to go East (appetite whetted by Marco Polo’s tales) than the East has to look West (China stops funding voyages showing little to no economic payoff).  The 18th century Enlightenment is propelled by science and technology (Boulton and Watt’s efficient steam engine) and finance (banking hub in the Netherlands), and growth shifts to northwestern Europe (factories in Britain), followed by the U.S. (industrialization, stock ownership, and consumerism).  In the East, the core shifts to Japan (Tokyo is now the world’s largest urban area with 27 million people) before returning most recently to China.  The result is our present-day, precarious, China-as-creditor/America-as-debtor arrangement (coined “Chimerica” by historian Ferguson and economist Schularick).
Next comes Morris’s educated guess about what will happen next:
  1. Future:  East again catches West.  “As surely as geography dictated that the West would rule, it also dictates that the East will catch up, exploiting the advantages of its backwardness until its social development overtakes the West’s.”
“But here we encounter another irony.  Rising social development has always changed the meaning of geography, and in the twenty-first century, development will rise so high that geography will cease to mean anything at all.  The only thing that will count is the race between a Singularity and Nightfall.” (p. 619)
If the “five horsemen of the apocalypse” (climate change, famine, mass migration, epidemic, and state failure) trample humankind during the next few decades, we will succumb to Isaac Asimov’s terrifying Lagashian Nightfall before reaching Ray Kurzweil’s enthusiastic vision of the Singularity, when human and machine intelligence (are projected to) merge by around 2040.  Morris’s extrapolation of his social development numbers shows East surpassing West around 2100; however, ironically, if we are “fortunate enough” to reach the Singularity before Nightfall, the distinction between West and East will no longer matter.  By that time, as “machine-enhanced, post-biological creatures,” we will come to realize the irrelevance of the quaint “West vs. East” squabbling that once preoccupied us when we were “mere biological humans” earlier in our evolutionary history!
If Morris’s informed wisdom is right, our future will be even weirder than Thomas Friedman’s “global weirding” (which itself is weirder than global warming).  Get used to it.  Prepare to see a warping of the shape of history over the next few decades as social and technological change accelerates to infinite speed! (**)
Towards a More Inclusive Theory
But, wait a minute.  Is Morris right about our future?  What if, instead of experiencing a Singularity, we continue to muddle through at conventional evolutionary speed?
Surely, Morris is a unifier.  By analogy, he is archeology and history’s Newton (classical mechanics) or, better yet, a Maxwell (classical electromagnetism), but not yet an Einstein (seeker of a complete unified field theory).  Similar to Maxwell, who taught us that light is a combination of electric and magnetic phenomena, Morris provides a way of viewing humanity across the West-East divide.  However, extending beyond Eurasia-centric West and East, a more comprehensive theory would need to include at least South and Southeast Asia (with India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, Indonesia and the Philippines), South and Central America (with Brazil and Mexico), and Africa (which by 2100 is projected to have 11 of the top 20 countries by population, including Nigeria, Tanzania, DR Congo, Ethiopia and Uganda in the top 10).  In a sense, Morris’s focus on Eurasia is an example of what he elsewhere calls “chainsaw art,” making crude cuts to exhibit gross features, while ignoring finer detailing.  Because in science a single exception is sufficient to invalidate a theory, the greater diversity of our world requires a broader scope encompassing the developmental history of all geographical regions, not just Eurasia.
Perhaps a more inclusive theory would shed light on the likelihood of some other region of our world rising to global leadership as we muddle along, “rarely knowing what we are doing,” as Morris says.  If it is true that “people—in large groups—are all much the same,” what is to prevent a crowded India, resource-rich Brazil, or quickly expanding Nigeria from one day leading the pack?  After all, they too must be as “lazy, greedy and frightened” as Eurasians, also “looking for easier, more profitable, and safer ways to do things,” right?  As technology becomes more available and affordable (ever ponder what happens when 3D-printing extends to food?), more rapid oscillations in development and shifts in world leadership could conceivably lie ahead.
Maybe a Singularity (or Nightfall) really is the most probable outcome, but from my humble perspective, claiming that cultural distinctions will be erased through a Singularity appears to be the “lazy” way out of a messy, multi-continental analysis—one that, if done properly, should embrace all of the greater complexity inherent in the colorful history and cultural diversity of humankind.
In Morris’s recounting, both “Albert in 1848 Beijing” and “Zheng in 1431 Tenochtitlan,” of course, were only fictional.  How about “Morris in the 2040 Singularity”?  Ian Morris was born in Stoke-on-Kent (also called Potteries—think “Wedgwood”), England, in 1960, and as a teenager in 1970s Britain “sat around wearing American jeans, watching American films, and playing American guitars.”  In the early 2000s, when Professor Morris was busy at Stanford researching and writing Why the West Rules—For Now, “the China price” became “the three scariest words in U.S. industry,” as made-in-China anything and everything hollowed out American manufacturing.  By the time the 2040s come around, will Chimerica prove to be reality or chimera?  By 2050, I hope to read Professor Emeritus Morris’s sequel, Why the West-East Divide No Longer Matters—For the Singularity is Here!  Or, might it be, Why the East Now Rules—For the Singularity Will be Late in Arriving?  Or, maybe even, Why Africa Rules—A Fortuitous 60,000 year Homecoming?

(*)  On p. 113 of Why the West Rules—For Now, Morris mentions Leo Tolstoy’s “odd excursus denying free will in history.”  He offers a slightly modified quote from the Second Epilogue, Chapter 11, of Tolstoy’s War and Peace that cites the laws of Kepler and Newton.  Next, Morris calls Tolstoy’s thinking “high-level nonsense.”  In my opinion, Morris is being (uncharacteristically, for his writing is otherwise quite level-headed and gentlemanly) too harsh and judgmental here.  As the next and final chapter in the Second Epilogue of War and Peace reveals, Tolstoy is posing two viewpoints for understanding history—an older one based on Ptolemaic-style individual free will (what Morris calls, “great men and bungling idiots”) and a newer one based on Copernican-style universal natural law (science-based).  Among these opposing viewpoints, Tolstoy states an intellectual preference for the utility of the universal-law approach over postulating individual free-will-based causes to explain historical events.
Tolstoy mentions an interesting analogy:  Just as we do not feel the earth’s motion (we think we are not moving) but must admit it (our motion) to understand the laws of astronomy, we also are not conscious of our dependence on everybody and every thing around us (we think we have free will) but must admit it (our lack of true freedom) in order to understand the laws of history.  In other words, as Einstein was so adept at showing us through his Gedanken experiments relating to relativity, one’s frame-of-reference matters, especially when theorizing.  Personally, I find more harmony than discord in the philosophy behind Tolstoy’s “odd excursus” and Morris’s own style of analysis.

(**)  As if global weirding and the Singularity are already not weird enough, consider philosopher Nick Bostrom’s “simulation argument” which, for our purposes, essentially states:  Assuming that a) the human species will most likely not become extinct before reaching “post-human” stage (i.e., we avoid Nightfall), and b) advanced civilizations, including our own, are prone to running simulations of their evolutionary history (and variations thereof), we are forced to conclude that, although we feel that we are “truly real” flesh and bones, we are, like it or not, almost certainly “merely artificial” beings living inside of a more advanced civilization’s simulation.  Now, that’s quite a humbling predicament for any free-willed humanist, isn’t it?

24 Comments:

Blogger Tyler Jackson said...

better bridges the gap between the humanities and the sciences—the book should be required summer reading for all freshmen entering college


invest in stocks

1:07 PM, February 10, 2014  
Blogger sathyam shonkho said...

The best place for investment in power sector is prodigy oil and gas company usa

9:51 PM, February 25, 2014  
Blogger Elizabeth harville said...

yet an Einstein (seeker of a complete unified field theory). Similar to Maxwell,
Unitedhealth Group Stock Price

10:43 PM, February 25, 2014  
Blogger SHRISTOCKTIPS said...

Share Market Investment made profitable by SHRISTOCKTIPS- Get NSE/BSE Tips via SMS and Yahoo Messenger. We give daily stock market tips for future and cash segments. As said last time we made a sell position in NIFTY around 6350-6400 we booked the profit at 6100 level. Our all paid & trial clients made a very handsome profit. Now for the coming week weBSE, STOCK TIPSsuggest all the traders to make a buy position in NIFTY around 6300-6400 for the target of 6700-6800 with stoploss of 6100.Traders can also make a buy position in all NIFTY 50 stocks according to the level of NIFTY. Please trade with strict stoploss because there may be a high volatility in the market. For Further update keep following our website & you can also avail our two days trial to check our accuracy.
Regards
SHRISTOCKTIPS TEAM

4:52 AM, March 12, 2014  
Blogger Harish Kumar said...

This is very nice blog and have great information. I also some information about the new project MDLF Ultima Phase 2, Gurgaon. Find More information of this Project like prices, resale, Floor Plans on Favista.com.DLF Ultima Phase 2

11:29 PM, April 02, 2014  
Blogger Mitus Mita said...

This article is mind blowing. When I read this article, I enjoyed.

Managed IT Services

3:58 AM, April 04, 2014  
Blogger Arjun Kumar said...

This is very informative blog...Thanks for sharing with us. I have also avail information about the best new project Umang Monsoon Breeze Phase 2

7:43 AM, April 30, 2014  
Anonymous Investment in Stocks said...

Thank you for this nice post.
I like this kind of post ,
Because it gives me clear and beautiful ideas about this topic.
I hope your prosperity.

1:38 PM, May 28, 2014  
Blogger teco kumpul said...

Hi,let's joint with us. Make money from Amazon with Wp-Amazillionaire.com

7:15 PM, July 11, 2014  
Blogger Aaron Grey said...

Hi, Nice site I enjoyed reading it. Thanks for sharing. Would it be possible if I contact you through your email? Please email me back. Thanks!

Aaron Grey
aarongrey112 at gmail.com

10:59 PM, August 26, 2014  
Anonymous Iftekhar Ahmed said...

Glad to read your post :). It is very informative!

1:18 AM, September 14, 2014  
Anonymous Debt Management Plan said...

Your article is very useful and have good knowledge, thanks for the post.

4:49 AM, September 14, 2014  
Anonymous Free Online Games said...

Very value able post, I read the whole story when I start reading it.

10:11 AM, September 14, 2014  
Anonymous Radiator Covers UK said...

I appreciate your blog post, beautifully expressed and well written.

11:52 AM, September 14, 2014  
Blogger apeksha sharma said...

To trade successfully in commodity market, one must gain tips from any MCX market advisory to trade in an efficient manner, specially for long term trading.

4:30 AM, September 24, 2014  
Blogger Rahul Kadam said...

If we discuss about Indian stock market then, Epic Research company is amongst the leading stock tips provider of the market.

4:02 AM, October 21, 2014  
Anonymous QUALITY STOCKS UNDER 5 DOLLARS said...

Nice material

3:05 PM, December 14, 2014  
Anonymous Commodity Trading Tips said...

In overseas markets, energy stocks led losses in European stocks as crude oil prices continued to drop after a steep selloff overnight. Asian stocks tumbled after overnight sharp slide in US stocks triggered by another plunge in oil prices and concerns about the political situation in Greece.
Online Stock Tips

12:00 AM, January 07, 2015  
Anonymous epicresearch.co said...

Amazing investment and trading blog, beyond our expectations.

3:32 AM, March 03, 2015  
Blogger Anand Agrawal said...

We provide best intraday tips,100 accurate intraday trading tips and jackpot share market tips. Call now +91-8486224486
share market tips
intraday trading tips
intraday tips

1:57 AM, December 21, 2015  
Blogger Ram Katariya said...

The services and packages are very satisfactory of epic Research. Avail Stock tips package of it to gain the high amount from market.

3:17 AM, July 12, 2016  
Blogger Sindhuja Ravi said...

Thank you for taking the time to provide us with your valuable information. We strive to provide our candidates with excellent care and we take your comments to heart.As always, we appreciate your confidence and trust in us
Digital Marketing Company in India

9:52 PM, March 19, 2017  
Blogger ananthi said...

this is very nice blog.this is very nice article interesting thanks for this articles.this kind of when is so useful to learn in my life and also motivate me to write something new information.

Hadoop Training in Chennai

10:16 PM, November 02, 2017  
Blogger Elly Rose said...

Investing and saving helps you to reach your financial goals. It is not a good idea to invest in something that is currently declining in price. It is always good to consult a good investor. There are very few investors who can guide you the best. Jeremy Hughes is one of them which I know.
Jeremy Hughes Perth

7:59 AM, November 11, 2017  

Post a Comment

<< Home