The Impact of Sidelined Cash in Disequilibrium on the Stock Market
The purpose of this note is to reconcile two contrasting viewpoints on how the amount of cash in our economy impacts future stock prices:
A. Sidelined Cash View: An example of the view that cash held in investor accounts matters is Alexander Green's commentary this week: 'In February . . . the decline in stocks was just about over [because] . . . [t]here was more money available to buy shares than at any time in almost two decades. The $8.85 trillion held in cash, bank deposits and money market funds was equal to 74% of the market value of U.S. companies, the highest ratio since 1990, according to the Federal Reserve. . . . [T]here is still over $8 trillion on the sidelines earning next to nothing in short-term deposits. . . . Expect to see cash coming off the sidelines to accumulate shares of the largest, most liquid firms around the globe.'
B. Equilibrium View: The opposite view, that consideration of market equilibrium reveals the "tautology" of speaking about cash on the sidelines, is voiced by John Hussman in his comment this week: '[A]s a result of more than a trillion dollars of new issuance of Treasury securities with relatively short durations, it is a tautology that there is a mountain of what is mistakenly viewed as “cash on the sidelines” invested in these securities. This mountain of “sideline cash” exists and must continue to exist as long as these additional government securities remain outstanding. It is an error to view outstanding debt securities as if they are “liquidity” poised to “flow back into the stock market.” The faith in that myth may very well spur some speculation in stocks, but it is a belief that is utterly detached from reality. The mountain of outstanding money market securities is the result of government debt issuance that must be held by somebody until those securities are retired. It is not spendable “liquidity” – it is a pile of IOUs printed up as evidence of money that has already been squandered. The analysts and financial news reporters who observe this enormous swamp of short-term money market securities, and talk about “cash on the sidelines” as if it is spendable in aggregate immediately reveal themselves to be unaware of the concept of equilibrium and of the nature of secondary markets (where there must be a buyer for every security sold, and a seller for every security bought).'
Which view is right? Is it useful from a trading or investment timing perspective to think of sidelined cash as waiting to flow back into the stock market? Or, does any particular stock transaction involve a mere transfer of cash from buyer to seller and, therefore, leave the aggregate amount of cash in the economy, sidelined or not, unchanged? Further, what is the long-run impact of the amount of cash in our economy, i.e., the money supply, on stock prices?
The Fed, the Treasury and the Private Sector
Three primary parties feature in our analysis: the Federal Reserve ("Fed"), the U.S. Treasury and the private sector. To illuminate essential points, I intentionally employ a "no frills" simplified model of the creation of cash (or, more generally, a broader measure, M2), bonds and stocks in the economy:
1. Cash Creation and Swap: The Fed creates cash (in the amount of 50 units) and swaps it with the Treasury for a like notional amount of newly issued government bonds.
Fed: Cash = -50, Bonds = 50
Treasury: Cash = 50, Bonds = -50
(In each of the skeletal balance sheets here and below, the sections shown in bold indicate a change from the immediately prior stage of the analysis.)
2. Deficit Spending: The government uses the cash to finance expenditures such as national security, infrastructure projects, entitlements and other deficit spending. The private sector ends up holding the cash, received from the government through employment and entitlements.
Fed: Cash = -50, Bonds = 50
Treasury: Cash = 0, Bonds = -50
Private Sector: Cash = 50
3. More Bond Issuance: The Treasury issues more bonds, this time to private sector investors instead of to the Fed.
Fed: Cash = -50, Bonds = 50
Treasury: Cash = 50, Bonds = -100
Private Sector: Cash = 0, Bonds = 50
4. More Deficit Spending: The government deploys the cash in accordance with its budget, with the private sector again being the recipient of the cash.
Fed: Cash = -50, Bonds = 50
Treasury: Cash = 0, Bonds = -100
Private Sector: Cash = 50, Bonds = 50
5. Entrepreneur-Led Growth: Assisted by years of government spending on infrastructure, enterprising individuals form companies and develop new technologies and products for growing consumer markets. Rising stock prices of these entrepreneurial companies represent new wealth creation, seemingly materializing "out of thin air," but actually resulting from the "value-add" through conversion of natural resources, labor, capital and technology into useful products and services.
Fed: Cash = -50, Bonds = 50
Treasury: Cash = 0, Bonds = -100
Private Sector: Cash = 50, Bonds = 50, Stocks = 100
6. Business Cycle: As the market's perception of future business prospects shifts, stock prices rise and fall. The corresponding aggregate wealth held by the private sector in stocks fluctuates from a cycle low of, say, 75, to a cycle high of, say, 150. At the nadir of the business cycle, the corresponding cash-to-stocks ratio is 50/75 = 67%, while at the peak this ratio is 50/150 = 33%.
7. Government's Rescue Plan: During the depths of an extended recession (i.e., when stocks = 75), the government implements an economic rescue plan, involving
a. Creation of more money (25) by the Fed;
b. The Fed's use of this money to purchase lower credit assets from banks;
c. Banks' use of the proceeds to purchase new bonds from the Treasury.
This plan strengthens bank balance sheets and provides the government with cash for new deficit spending. (By deliberate design, this model parallels the actions taken by the Fed and Treasury over the past half year in dealing with the current financial crisis.)
Fed: Cash = -75, Bonds = 50, Other Assets = 25
Treasury: Cash = 25, Bonds = -125
Banks: Bonds = 25, Other Assets = -25
Private Sector: Cash = 50, Bonds = 50, Stocks = 75.
8. Still More Deficit Spending: The government deploys its new cash of 25 as part of a stimulus package to jump-start the economy (cf., Obama's approximately $1 trillion fiscal stimulus package, currently being deployed). As before, the cash ends up in the hands of workers and consumers in the private sector.
Fed: Cash = -75, Bonds = 50, Other Assets = 25
Treasury: Cash = 0, Bonds = -125
Banks: Bonds = 25, Other Assets = -25
Private Sector: Cash = 75, Bonds = 50, Stocks = 75.
The result is an increase in the cash-to-stocks ratio to 75/75 = 100%, which is a sign of the gross disequilibrium now inherent in the economy, since the cash-to-stocks ratio is outside of its "normal" range of 33% to 67% shown in Stage 6 of our model.
How Both Views Can Be Right
First, although our model is very simple, it exhibits important monetary, fiscal and economic trends in the U.S. economy:
Within a framework of disequilibrium, let's now examine the situation at the end of Stage 8 of the scenario presented above. Given the new infusion of cash (from a sudden increase in the money supply), the stock market (along with other assets such as real estate) is arguably likely to rise, consistent with the Sidelined Cash view, as investors chase higher returns by buying stocks with the new portion of their "sidelined cash" (now 75, up from the recent figure of 50 in our model). The idea here is that, when enough newly printed aggregate cash from fiscal stimulus makes its way into consumers' and investors' hands, some combination of more consumption and more investment will (eventually) push asset prices higher. Though ostensibly at variance with the Equilibrium view he espouses, Hussman points out that a probable outcome of current government policy is "a near-doubling of the U.S. price level over the next decade," citing Nobel economist Joseph Stiglitz's characterization of the government's strategy as "trying to recreate the bubble [in a way] [t]hat's not likely to provide a long-run solution . . . [but instead] says let's kick the can down the road a little bit."
To sum up:
So, we might say that cash is continually rolling off the printing presses at the Fed as our government's deficit expands and the economy grows. This capacity of our government to print money, constrained at any moment but secularly unlimited, provides a large pool of sidelined cash that can jump-start a recessionary economy and, in practice, has an inflationary impact on stock and other asset prices. The ultimate long-run outcome of our government's deficit spending policy and its influence on the relative strength of the U.S. economy versus that of other countries is debatable but, in my opinion, a correct prognosis will involve both a) interpreting "sidelined cash" to include the capacity of the Fed to print new money and b) recognizing that our economy is always in disequilibrium.
A. Sidelined Cash View: An example of the view that cash held in investor accounts matters is Alexander Green's commentary this week: 'In February . . . the decline in stocks was just about over [because] . . . [t]here was more money available to buy shares than at any time in almost two decades. The $8.85 trillion held in cash, bank deposits and money market funds was equal to 74% of the market value of U.S. companies, the highest ratio since 1990, according to the Federal Reserve. . . . [T]here is still over $8 trillion on the sidelines earning next to nothing in short-term deposits. . . . Expect to see cash coming off the sidelines to accumulate shares of the largest, most liquid firms around the globe.'
B. Equilibrium View: The opposite view, that consideration of market equilibrium reveals the "tautology" of speaking about cash on the sidelines, is voiced by John Hussman in his comment this week: '[A]s a result of more than a trillion dollars of new issuance of Treasury securities with relatively short durations, it is a tautology that there is a mountain of what is mistakenly viewed as “cash on the sidelines” invested in these securities. This mountain of “sideline cash” exists and must continue to exist as long as these additional government securities remain outstanding. It is an error to view outstanding debt securities as if they are “liquidity” poised to “flow back into the stock market.” The faith in that myth may very well spur some speculation in stocks, but it is a belief that is utterly detached from reality. The mountain of outstanding money market securities is the result of government debt issuance that must be held by somebody until those securities are retired. It is not spendable “liquidity” – it is a pile of IOUs printed up as evidence of money that has already been squandered. The analysts and financial news reporters who observe this enormous swamp of short-term money market securities, and talk about “cash on the sidelines” as if it is spendable in aggregate immediately reveal themselves to be unaware of the concept of equilibrium and of the nature of secondary markets (where there must be a buyer for every security sold, and a seller for every security bought).'
Which view is right? Is it useful from a trading or investment timing perspective to think of sidelined cash as waiting to flow back into the stock market? Or, does any particular stock transaction involve a mere transfer of cash from buyer to seller and, therefore, leave the aggregate amount of cash in the economy, sidelined or not, unchanged? Further, what is the long-run impact of the amount of cash in our economy, i.e., the money supply, on stock prices?
The Fed, the Treasury and the Private Sector
Three primary parties feature in our analysis: the Federal Reserve ("Fed"), the U.S. Treasury and the private sector. To illuminate essential points, I intentionally employ a "no frills" simplified model of the creation of cash (or, more generally, a broader measure, M2), bonds and stocks in the economy:
1. Cash Creation and Swap: The Fed creates cash (in the amount of 50 units) and swaps it with the Treasury for a like notional amount of newly issued government bonds.
Fed: Cash = -50, Bonds = 50
Treasury: Cash = 50, Bonds = -50
(In each of the skeletal balance sheets here and below, the sections shown in bold indicate a change from the immediately prior stage of the analysis.)
2. Deficit Spending: The government uses the cash to finance expenditures such as national security, infrastructure projects, entitlements and other deficit spending. The private sector ends up holding the cash, received from the government through employment and entitlements.
Fed: Cash = -50, Bonds = 50
Treasury: Cash = 0, Bonds = -50
Private Sector: Cash = 50
3. More Bond Issuance: The Treasury issues more bonds, this time to private sector investors instead of to the Fed.
Fed: Cash = -50, Bonds = 50
Treasury: Cash = 50, Bonds = -100
Private Sector: Cash = 0, Bonds = 50
4. More Deficit Spending: The government deploys the cash in accordance with its budget, with the private sector again being the recipient of the cash.
Fed: Cash = -50, Bonds = 50
Treasury: Cash = 0, Bonds = -100
Private Sector: Cash = 50, Bonds = 50
5. Entrepreneur-Led Growth: Assisted by years of government spending on infrastructure, enterprising individuals form companies and develop new technologies and products for growing consumer markets. Rising stock prices of these entrepreneurial companies represent new wealth creation, seemingly materializing "out of thin air," but actually resulting from the "value-add" through conversion of natural resources, labor, capital and technology into useful products and services.
Fed: Cash = -50, Bonds = 50
Treasury: Cash = 0, Bonds = -100
Private Sector: Cash = 50, Bonds = 50, Stocks = 100
6. Business Cycle: As the market's perception of future business prospects shifts, stock prices rise and fall. The corresponding aggregate wealth held by the private sector in stocks fluctuates from a cycle low of, say, 75, to a cycle high of, say, 150. At the nadir of the business cycle, the corresponding cash-to-stocks ratio is 50/75 = 67%, while at the peak this ratio is 50/150 = 33%.
7. Government's Rescue Plan: During the depths of an extended recession (i.e., when stocks = 75), the government implements an economic rescue plan, involving
a. Creation of more money (25) by the Fed;
b. The Fed's use of this money to purchase lower credit assets from banks;
c. Banks' use of the proceeds to purchase new bonds from the Treasury.
This plan strengthens bank balance sheets and provides the government with cash for new deficit spending. (By deliberate design, this model parallels the actions taken by the Fed and Treasury over the past half year in dealing with the current financial crisis.)
Fed: Cash = -75, Bonds = 50, Other Assets = 25
Treasury: Cash = 25, Bonds = -125
Banks: Bonds = 25, Other Assets = -25
Private Sector: Cash = 50, Bonds = 50, Stocks = 75.
8. Still More Deficit Spending: The government deploys its new cash of 25 as part of a stimulus package to jump-start the economy (cf., Obama's approximately $1 trillion fiscal stimulus package, currently being deployed). As before, the cash ends up in the hands of workers and consumers in the private sector.
Fed: Cash = -75, Bonds = 50, Other Assets = 25
Treasury: Cash = 0, Bonds = -125
Banks: Bonds = 25, Other Assets = -25
Private Sector: Cash = 75, Bonds = 50, Stocks = 75.
The result is an increase in the cash-to-stocks ratio to 75/75 = 100%, which is a sign of the gross disequilibrium now inherent in the economy, since the cash-to-stocks ratio is outside of its "normal" range of 33% to 67% shown in Stage 6 of our model.
How Both Views Can Be Right
First, although our model is very simple, it exhibits important monetary, fiscal and economic trends in the U.S. economy:
- The amount of cash in the economy increases over time (from 0 to 75 in our model) as the economy grows and the Fed prints money to provide a currency to accommodate transactions among consumers and producers;
- The amount of government debt increases over time (from 0 to 125 in our model) as the Treasury issues bonds to fund the government's growing budget deficit;
- The value of the stock market rises secularly (from 0 to 100 in our model) as innovation, population growth and economic growth drive aggregate earnings of companies higher;
- Also, stock prices are prone to fluctuations (from 75 to 150 in our model), due to changes in market participants' perceptions of the future business prospects and earnings potential of companies within the economy.
Within a framework of disequilibrium, let's now examine the situation at the end of Stage 8 of the scenario presented above. Given the new infusion of cash (from a sudden increase in the money supply), the stock market (along with other assets such as real estate) is arguably likely to rise, consistent with the Sidelined Cash view, as investors chase higher returns by buying stocks with the new portion of their "sidelined cash" (now 75, up from the recent figure of 50 in our model). The idea here is that, when enough newly printed aggregate cash from fiscal stimulus makes its way into consumers' and investors' hands, some combination of more consumption and more investment will (eventually) push asset prices higher. Though ostensibly at variance with the Equilibrium view he espouses, Hussman points out that a probable outcome of current government policy is "a near-doubling of the U.S. price level over the next decade," citing Nobel economist Joseph Stiglitz's characterization of the government's strategy as "trying to recreate the bubble [in a way] [t]hat's not likely to provide a long-run solution . . . [but instead] says let's kick the can down the road a little bit."
To sum up:
- The Sidelined Cash view correctly points out that "cash on the sidelines" can drive stock prices higher; however, by failing to distinguish between aggregate cash in the economy and cash held by individual investors, this view leaves too much room for (mis)interpretation;
- The Equilibrium view is right in pointing out that the aggregate amount of cash in the economy does not change when investors trade stocks with each other; however, this view fails to incorporate the disequilibrating impact of new cash creation by the Fed (and the banking system).
So, we might say that cash is continually rolling off the printing presses at the Fed as our government's deficit expands and the economy grows. This capacity of our government to print money, constrained at any moment but secularly unlimited, provides a large pool of sidelined cash that can jump-start a recessionary economy and, in practice, has an inflationary impact on stock and other asset prices. The ultimate long-run outcome of our government's deficit spending policy and its influence on the relative strength of the U.S. economy versus that of other countries is debatable but, in my opinion, a correct prognosis will involve both a) interpreting "sidelined cash" to include the capacity of the Fed to print new money and b) recognizing that our economy is always in disequilibrium.
posted by Lloyd Sakazaki at 9:33 PM
45 Comments:
Thanks for giving the view of stock market. The details you have provided are very helpful and for a newbie this can help in understanding the requirements of stock market and also know the best stock market timing...
Thanks again for sharing
It is the degree of DISEQUALIBRIUM that is making market timing more like weather probabilities and casino gambling than investing for future profit returns. The global markets is in need of a good dose of boredom and far less speculation.
Is the Economy Scaring You Away From Real Estate? It Shouldn't! Please check out http://www.coachingbypeter.com?a_aid=ron
Peter Vekselman is a Real Estate Broker and Investment Coach. He have successfully coached his previous clients nationwide.If you want to learn exactly how these hard times can create your real estate fortune, join Peter Vekselman as one of his private one-on-one coaching client. You can get a free phone consultation directly with Peter, just visit http://www.coachingbypeter.com/?a_aid=ron
Writing a good for me, I find this blog. I will often come to this blog.
Thanks
You're raising an interesting point on what happens to cash during a recession.
And I think the real answer is somewhere in the middle.
It might be true that as investors exit stock market and start hoarding cash supply of cash increases, but at the same time not many investors would sit on the sidelines with lots of cash but instead start investing in safer products like gold and monopoly stocks, like utility companies.
Dear,
I want to make 1 guest post in your blog, if you permit me. The post contains 350 words above and totally unique as it is written by my content writers.
Please contact me at ericasmith568(at)gmail.com soon. Moreover, I will place your link in one of my finance sites.
I will never believed in any "prediction" from any expert.
I only believed in my own judgment.
Invest in Portugal
Portugal, seeking strong personalities or groups in the world who want to invest Building projects (Tourism, Trade, Housing, Industry) in Portugal (Algarve, Lisbon).
More information: (list of investments)
aguapo.investportugal@gmail.com
Best regards,
Aurélio Guapo
Einstein(?) said something along the lines that genius is the ability to hold two opposing thoughts in your head at once. Nice demonstration of that idea.
Great idea for sharing this view of the stock market.
Real estate is one of the best businesses now a day. Nice real estate blog. Thanks
Click here for : Homes North Miami for Sale
Thanks so much for this! I haven't been this moved by a blog for a long time! You’ve got it, whatever that means in blogging. Anyway, You are definitely someone that has something to say that people need to hear. Keep up the good work. Keep on inspiring the people!
regards:
Share Tips
I truly like to reading your post. Thank you so much for taking the time to share such a nice information. I'll definitely add this great post in my article section.
SM Residences
Besta Meyer
I have a web site where I give advise on penny stocks and stocks under five dollars. I have many many years of experience with these type of stocks. I would like to take a moment to talk about low price stocks not classic penny stocks or stocks under one dollar the term most people most often think of when the word penny stock is used. Their are companies of really decent quality trading under five dollars’ but for every one company trading under five dollars that is of decent quality their are maybe ten of poor quality. So the really big difference between those investors that are tremendously successfull when it comes to investing in low price stocks and those investors that lose enormous amounts of money investing in stocks under five dollars’ is having a great deal of knowledge and experience when it comes to low price stocks’ or having a total lack of knowledge and experience when it comes to low price stocks. Finding quality stocks under five dollars requires a lot more research than finding a decent stock above ten dollars.
Valuable information on stock market!!!
I read your post. This is very nice and informative post. I like this all information about stock market, Economy, invest Building projects etc.
The money-on-the-sidelines argument has reached deafening and self-confirming as anchoring bias among any and every swollen long-only manager seems to have made them ignore the realities of the situation.
Share Trading
Hey there, You've done an excellent job. I’ll definitely digg it and personally recommend to my friends. I am sure they will be benefited from this site.
Its very nice. I always read your informative posts. I want to add A real estate project Supertech Hues Sector 68, Gurgaon. Find More information of this Project like payment Plans, reviews, prices on Favista.com.Supertech Hues Gurgaon
You've got an investor buying the security and a dis-investor selling the security. On a net basis, no money has been sidelined.
To trade successfully in stock market, one must gain best stock market tips to trade in an efficient manner, specially for long term trading.
Get best share market tips from Epic Research company in all segments of trading.
The company, known as Epic Research, delivers highly accurate and profitable stock recommendations to its customers, consequently creating satisfied customers.
This is an interesting post. Stock traders must be aware of sidelined cash's impact on the Stock market.
Great blog, always serves us with some essential and updated information regarding investment and trading strategies.
Thanks for sharing this blog. This is really amazing information. Do write more about Mutual Funds in Pakistan .
Your zakat carries the power to change the lives of people around the world for the better.
Donate Zakat with Muslim rose today to help others throughout the world.You're Zakat donations can help those less fortunate. Donate today.
Retro Biker Jacket
Awesome and interesting article. Great things you've always shared with us. Thanks. Just continue composing this kind of post.
brown bane coat for men
Looking for a London courier service? If yes so you are at the right place Speedy sprint courier service makes finding the right Online Courier service for you easy. As the Best Speedy Sprint Courier across London. We offer a wide range of parcel collection with Same Day Pickup and Same Day Delivery services, including expedited and premium options to ensure maximum flexibility for our customers. Speedy Sprint has to be done as fast and headache-free as feasible so let’s goodbye to searching Speedy sprint courier near me.
Donate Sadaqah Online to Muslims charity through Muslim Rose Today to help extremely poor people around the world.
Your online sadaqah can help those less fortunate. Donate Today….!!
Donate zakat and sadaqah With Ummah Charity To Helps Poor People.
A great decision for your design needs! From our racer themed gathering we brought to you our Men's Steve McQueen Biker Jacket. Comprised of cotton, this coat has pockets on its outside and inside. It has long sleeves which suits your needs and solace. This coat has focal zipper attaching that makes it simple to wear. It has an ideal fitting with premium sewing that will without a doubt add a degree of class to your look.
Formal Leather Wear a classic choice for your fashion needs! From our military-themed collection we brought to you our 50 Cent Power Shearling Leather Jacket
Awesome and interesting article Great things you've always shared with us
Same Day courier
I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in writing this article. I am hoping the same best work from you in the future as well. Eassy Cars
Nice post! This is a very nice blog that I will definitively come back to more times this year! Thanks for informative post
Appreciating the time and effort you put into your website and thorough information you present. It’s amazing to come across a site every now and then that is not the similar old re-written material. Excellent read! We’ve bookmarked your site.
yahoo amazing post I have seen today. I am thinking to bookmarking your website so whenever I feel bored, I can easily touch you.
Thanks, guys for sharing your valuable info. I really appreciate your efforts and I am definitely waiting for your next post thank you once again, Regards
I haven’t any words to appreciate this post.....Really I am impressed by this post....the person who created this post was a great human..thanks for sharing this with us.
Nice Post!Thanks For sharing. We are a car removal service provider in Brisbane and among its suburbs for years paying top Cash for car Brisbane of any make and model.
Thank you very much for your blog post. Thanks again
Your website is really great, this is an incredibly exciting article. Thank you very much.
Cash for Cars Brisbane
I was looking for this article for a long time. Thank you for sharing this. We offer Car Removal Adelaide vehicles. We also sell second hand cars of all makes and models.
Post a Comment
<< Home